Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38571526

ABSTRACT

Objective: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccinations have been shown to prevent infection with efficacies ranging from 50% to 95%. This study assesses the impact of vaccination on the clinical severity of COVID-19 during the second wave in Brunei Darussalam in 2021, which was due to the Delta variant. Methods: Patients included in this study were randomly selected from those who were admitted with COVID-19 to the National Isolation Centre between 7 August and 6 October 2021. Cases were categorized as asymptomatic, mild (symptomatic without pneumonia), moderate (pneumonia), severe (needing supplemental oxygen therapy) or critical (needing mechanical ventilation) but for statistical analysis purposes were dichotomized into asymptomatic/mild or moderate/severe/critical cases. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify risk factors associated with moderate/severe/critical disease. Propensity score-matched analysis was also performed to evaluate the impact of vaccination on disease severity. Results: The study cohort of 788 cases (mean age: 42.1 ± 14.6 years; 400 males) comprised 471 (59.8%) asymptomatic/mild and 317 (40.2%) moderate/severe/critical cases. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed older age group (≥ 45 years), diabetes mellitus, overweight/obesity and vaccination status to be associated with increased severity of disease. In propensity score-matched analysis, the relative risk of developing moderate/severe/critical COVID-19 for fully vaccinated (two doses) and partially vaccinated (one dose) cases was 0.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-0.69) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.46-0.82), respectively, compared with a control group of non-vaccinated cases. The corresponding relative risk reduction (RRR) values were 66.5% and 38.4%, respectively. Vaccination was also protective against moderate/severe/critical disease in a subgroup of overweight/obese patients (RRR: 37.2%, P = 0.007). Discussion: Among those who contracted COVID-19, older age, having diabetes, being overweight/obese and being unvaccinated were significant risk factors for moderate/severe/critical disease. Vaccination, even partial, was protective against moderate/severe/critical disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Overweight , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Brunei , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Obesity , Patient Acuity , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Female
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36816352

ABSTRACT

Objective: Patients who recover from coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection are at risk of long-term health disorders and may require prolonged health care. This retrospective observational study assesses the number of health-care visits before and after COVID-19 infection in Brunei Darussalam. Methods: COVID-19 cases from the first wave with 12 months of follow-up were included. Health-care utilization was defined as health-care visits for consultations or investigations. Post-COVID condition was defined using the World Health Organization definition. Results: There were 132 cases; 59.1% were male and the mean age was 37.1 years. The mean number of health-care visits 12 months after recovery from COVID-19 (123 cases, 93.2%; mean 5.0 ± 5.2) was significantly higher than the prior 12 months (87 cases, 65.9%, P < 0.001; mean 3.2 ± 5.7, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference when scheduled COVID-19 visits were excluded (3.6 ± 4.9, P = 0.149). All 22 cases with moderate to critical disease recovered without additional health-care visits apart from planned post-COVID-19 visits. Six patients had symptoms of post-COVID condition, but none met the criteria for diagnosis or had alternative diagnoses. Discussion: There were significantly more health-care visits following recovery from COVID-19. However, this was due to scheduled post-COVID-19 visits as per the national management protocol. This protocol was amended before the second wave to omit post-COVID-19 follow-up, except for complicated cases or cases with no documented radiological resolution of COVID-19 pneumonia. This will reduce unnecessary health-care visits and conserve precious resources that were stretched to the limit during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , SARS-CoV-2 , Brunei , Delivery of Health Care , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36688181

ABSTRACT

Problem: Soon after the start of the second wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Brunei Darussalam, which was confirmed to be due to the more infectious Delta strain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), it became apparent that the National Isolation Centre (NIC) was not coping. Context: The NIC was the only isolation and treatment centre for COVID-19 in Brunei Darussalam. During the first wave and the first 11 days of the second wave, all confirmed cases were admitted to the NIC for isolation and treatment in line with the management strategy to isolate all confirmed cases to control the outbreak. Action: The Ministry of Health opened five community isolation centres and two quarantine centres to divert asymptomatic and mild cases from the NIC. The community isolation centres also functioned as triage centres for the NIC, and the quarantine centres accommodated recovered patients who did not have their own quarantine facilities. Outcome: The community isolation and quarantine centres diverted cases from the NIC and enabled recovered cases to be transferred to these step-down facilities. This reduced the NIC's occupancy to a safe level and enabled the reorganization of the NIC to function as a treatment centre and a national COVID-19 hospital. Discussion: During any disease outbreak, health facilities must be prepared to adapt to changing situations. Strong leadership, stakeholder commitments, teamwork and constant communication are important in this process.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Brunei/epidemiology , Quarantine , Hospitals
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36817502

ABSTRACT

Objective: This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study assessed the duration of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms during the second wave in Brunei Darussalam. Methods: Data from COVID-19 cases admitted to the National Isolation Centre during 7-30 August 2021 were included in the study. Symptom onset and daily symptom assessments were entered into a database during hospitalization and disease was categorized by severity. The time between symptom onset and hospital admission, the duration of symptoms and length of hospitalization were assessed separately by age group, disease severity and vaccination status using one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc corrections. Results: Data from 548 cases were included in the study: 55.7% (305) of cases were male, and cases had a mean age of 33.7 years. Overall, 81.3% (446) reported symptoms at admission (mean number of symptoms and standard deviation: 2.8 ± 1.6), with cough (59.1%; 324), fever (38.9%; 213) and sore throat (18.4%; 101) being the most common. Being older, having more severe disease and being unvaccinated were significantly associated with the time between symptom onset and hospital admission, symptom duration and length of hospitalization. Discussion: Knowing which factors predict the duration of COVID-19 symptoms can help in planning management strategies, such as the duration of isolation, predict the length of hospitalization and treatment, and provide more accurate counselling to patients regarding their illness.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Retrospective Studies , Brunei , Cross-Sectional Studies , Vaccination
6.
Int Ophthalmol ; 33(3): 277-84, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23229396

ABSTRACT

To review the etiologies, prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) occurring in the population of Brunei Darussalam, and provide guidelines to prevent and manage such injuries. A retrospective review was performed for all cases of traumatic IOFBs managed in our centre during a 3-year period between May 2008 and April 2011. The mechanism of injury, management, complications and visual outcomes were analyzed. Majority of the patients were males (93 %) and the mean age was 36 years. The main causes of trauma were metal hammering and grass cutting (43 % each). Other causes include road traffic accidents and firecracker explosion (7 % each). The visual outcome was ≥6/18 in 50 % and 'No perception of light' in 29 %. Causes of poor visual outcome were retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (21 %), endophthalmitis (21 %) and globe maceration (7 %). Prognostic factors associated with significantly worse final visual outcome included posterior location of the IOFB (p = 0.05) and larger IOFB size (p < 0.001). The time from injury to surgery did not correlate with a worse visual prognosis. In Brunei Darussalam, the commonest causes of IOFBs are hammering metal and cutting grass using power tools. The visual outcome varies between 6/6 and NPL. Poor visual outcome is related to the severity of the initial ocular injury, posterior segment IOFB and endophthalmitis.


Subject(s)
Eye Foreign Bodies/etiology , Adult , Brunei , Eye Foreign Bodies/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Visual Acuity , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...